Journal of Hematology, ISSN 1927-1212 print, 1927-1220 online, Open Access
Article copyright, the authors; Journal compilation copyright, J Hematol and Elmer Press Inc
Journal website https://www.thejh.org

Original Article

Volume 12, Number 5, October 2023, pages 208-214


Validation of the New MINI-CUBE for Clinic Determination of Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1. Linear regression and bias plots for the methods comparison (n = 261). (a) Passing-Bablok regression analysis between MINI-CUBE vs. Westergren test, defined by the equation y = 1.00 + 1.00x, intercept A 1.00 (95% CI: 0.00 - 2.00), slope B 1.00 (95% CI: 0.98 - 1.04). It was evaluated R2 of 0.94 (95% CI: 0.928 - 0.955; P < 0.001). (b) Bland-Altman test defined by the Westergren test and MINI-CUBE results (y-axis) and the mean of the two methods. The dotted lines denote the limits of the agreement (max.:19.6; min.: -16.6), and the continued line denotes the bias of 1.5. CI: confidence interval; max.: maximum; min.: minimum; SD: standard deviation.
Figure 2.
Figure 2. Linear regression and bias plots for the methods comparison for all the samples with normal hematocrit (Hct) (36% - 44%) (n = 109). (a) Passing-Bablok regression analysis between MINI-CUBE vs. Westergren test, defined by the equation y = 3.778 + 0.889x, intercept 3.778 (95% CI: 0.00 - 5.143), slope 0.889 (95% CI: 0.777 - 5.954). It was evaluated R2 of 0.929 (95% CI: 0.898 - 0.951; P < 0.001). (b) Bland-Altman test defined by the Westergren test and MINI-CUBE results (y-axis) and the mean of the two methods. The dotted lines denote the limits of the agreement (max.:18.3; min.: -15.6), and the continued line denotes the bias of 1.3. CI: confidence interval; max.: maximum; min.: minimum; SD: standard deviation.

Tables

Table 1. Intra-Run, Inter-Run, and Inter-Instrument Precision Analysis With Quality Control ESR Control Cube
 
Level 1 controlLevel 2 control
EvaluatedDeclaredEvaluatedDeclared
Level 1 control: normal. Level 2 control: pathologic. ESR: erythrocyte sedimentation rate; SD: standard deviation; CV: coefficient of variation.
Intra-run (mm/h)
  Mean5.8313.0073.3394.00
  SD0.290.960.5810.49
  %CV4.9%7.4%0.8%11.2%
  Variance0.080.33
Inter-run (mm/h)
  Mean4.814.0073.3389.00
  SD1.010.832.329.46
  %CV21.1%5.9%3.2%11.0%
  Variance1.025.65
Inter-instruments (mm/h)
  Mean4.81372.5389.00
  SD1.301.084.0412.54
  %CV27.1%8.03%5.6%14.1%
  Variance1.7116.39

 

Table 2. Precision Analysis With Leftover Samples, Through the Measure of Mean, Repeatability, and Reproducibility
 
RC (%)RDC (%)Mean
RC: repeatability coefficient; RDC: reproducibility coefficient.
Sample 12.262.863.00
Sample 22.102.705.50
Sample 33.844.855.50
Sample 42.072.6110.67
Sample 51.031.3111.83
Sample 61.902.4115.17
Sample 71.311.6517.33
Sample 85.006.3245.50
Sample 95.867.4148.17
Sample 105.206.5364.83
Sample 111.311.65109.70
Sample 120.000.00140.00

 

Table 3. Results of Hemolysis Icterus, and Lipemia Interference on ESR Results
 
Passing and Bablok regressionBland-Altman
Correlation coefficientSignificance level95% CIMean bias95% CI
ESR: erythrocyte sedimentation rate; CI: confidence interval.
Icterus, n = 130.753P = 0.00290.346 - 0.9220.3-24.4 - 25
Lipemia, n = 90.921P = 0.00020.693 - 0.9816.1-20.7 - 32.9
Hemolysis, n = 130.750P = 0.01260.226 - 0.9370.8-6.3 - 7.9