Journal of Hematology, ISSN 1927-1212 print, 1927-1220 online, Open Access
Article copyright, the authors; Journal compilation copyright, J Hematol and Elmer Press Inc
Journal website https://www.thejh.org

Original Article

Volume 12, Number 6, December 2023, pages 243-254


Impact of Cytogenetic Abnormalities, Induction and Maintenance Regimens on Outcomes After High-Dose Chemotherapy and Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma: A Decade-Long Real-World Experience

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1. Progression-free survival (a) and overall survival (b) based on cytogenetic profile.
Figure 2.
Figure 2. Progression-free survival (a) and overall survival (b) based on presence of +1q abnormality among standard risk.
Figure 3.
Figure 3. Progression-free survival (a) and overall survival (b) based on lenalidomide-based induction.
Figure 4.
Figure 4. Progression-free survival (a) and overall survival (b) based on lenalidomide-based maintenance.
Figure 5.
Figure 5. Progression-free survival (a) and overall survival (b) based on proteasome inhibitor vs. non-proteasome inhibitor-based maintenance.

Tables

Table 1. Patient, Disease, and Response Characteristics
 
CharacteristicsHigh-risk cytogenetics (N = 73)Standard-risk cytogenetics (N = 363)P value
aPercentages may total greater than 100% as patients may have more than one cytogenetic abnormality. bP value for RVd vs. other. cP value is for lenalidomide alone vs. other maintenance regimens. *P < 0.05. RVD: lenalidomide - bortezomib - dexamethasone; Dara-RVD: daratumumab - lenalidomide - bortezomib - dexamethasone; CyBorD: cyclophosphamide - bortezomib - dexamethasone; Ig: immunoglobulin; ECOG: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; ISS: International Staging System; HCT-CI: hematopoietic cell transplantation comorbidity index; PI: proteasome inhibitor; sCR/CR: stringent complete response/complete response; VGPR: very good partial response; PR: partial response; SD: stable disease; PD: progressive disease.
Median age, years (range)
  At diagnosis60 (29 - 77)60 (21 - 81)0.86
  At ASCT62 (31 - 79)62 (25 - 81)0.71
Age > 65, n (%)17 (23)93 (26)0.68
Sex, n (%)
  Male39 (55)203 (56)0.70
  Female34 (45)160 (44)
Race/ethnicity, n (%)
  Non-Hispanic White46 (61)213 (82)0.51
  Non-Hispanic Black27 (36)161 (42)
  Other2 (3)6 (2)
Body mass index, n (%)
  < 30 kg/m240 (55)199 (55)0.72
  ≥ 30 kg/m233 (45)164 (45)
Subtype, n (%)
  IgG39 (53)230 (63)
  IgA23 (32)63 (18)0.05
  Light chain only9 (12)59 (163)
  Non-secretory2 (3)11 (3)
  Other
Durie-Salmon Staging System (DSS), n (%)
  I6 (8)33 (9)
  II10 (14)63 (17)
  III30 (41)107 (30)0.02*
  Unknown27 (37)160 (44)
International Staging System (ISS), n (%)
  I8 (10)104 (29)
  II18 (25)87 (24)
  III18 (25)86 (24)0.10
  Unknown29 (40)86 (23)
Revised International Staging System (R-ISS), n (%)
  I4 (5)52 (14)
  II12 (16)51 (14)< 0.001*
  III15 (21)19 (6)
  Unknown42 (58)241 (66)
ECOG performance status, n (%)
  010 (14)63 (17)
  159 (81)287 (79)0.17
  2+4 (5)7 (2)
  Missing06 (2)
Cytogenetic abnormalitiesa, n (%)
  Del 17p36 (48)0
  t4;1434 (45)0
  t14;166 (1)0< 0.001*
  t14;201 (1)2 (1)
  Amp 1q3 (4)0
  Gain 1q33 (44)89 (24)
HCT-CI, n (%)
  0 - 117 (35)94 (40)
  2 - 315 (31)92 (39)0.097
  4+17 (35)48 (21)
sCr > 2 or CrCl < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 at ASCT, n (%)
  Yes13 (18)53 (14)
  No44 (60)264 (73)
  Missing16 (22)46 (13)0.27
Melphalan dose, n (%)
  200 mg/m252 (71)286 (79)
  140 mg/m221 (29)77 (21)0.16
Induction regimen, n (%)b
  RVd29 (39)207 (57)
  Dara-RVd6 (8)26 (7)
  CyBordD1 (3)76 (21)0.01*
  Carfilzomib-based9 (11)23 (6)
  Other28 (39)31 (9)
Maintenance regimen, n (%)c
  Lenalidomide37 (51)264 (72)
  Lenalidomide + PI19 (26)26 (7)
  Lenalidomide + daratumumab4 (5)13 (4)< 0.001*
  PI only2 (4)13 (4)
  Other4 (5)4 (1)
  None7 (9)43 (12)
Best overall response post ASCT, n (%)
  sCR/CR33 (45)161 (44)
  VGPR29 (39)140 (38)
  PR4 (5)47 (13)0.01*
  SD4 (5)3 (1)
  PD3 (5)4 (1)
Response prior to ASCT, n (%)
  sCR/CR11 (15)61 (17)
  VGPR27 (37)155 (44)
  PR32 (44)135 (37)0.34
  SD3 (4)5 (1)
  PD0 (0)4 (1)
Response at day +100 post ASCT, n (%)
  sCR/CR29 (40)115 (32)
  VGPR34 (47)161 (44)
  PR3 (4)59 (16)
  SD1 (1)3 (1)0.09
  PD2 (3)7 (7)
Response at 2-years post ASCT, n (%)
  sCR/CR14 (19)82 (23)
  VGPR9 (12)61 (17)
  PR1 (1)21 (6)0.16
  SD2 (3)11 (3)
  PD15 (21)45 (12)

 

Table 2. Survival Outcomes and Response Rates by Factors of Cytogenetic Risk Profile, Induction, and Maintenance Regimen
 
PFS, median months (range)P valueOS, median months (range)P valueBest ORR, %P valueOverall VGPR, %P value
Cytogenetics
  High-risk29 (1 - 100)< 0.001*70 (1 - 101)0.13900.01850.67
  Standard-risk58 (1 - 123)NR (1 - 128)9683
Standard-risk
  With +1q38 (1 - 123)0.01*60 (1 - 123)0.01*980.64820.84
  Without +1q76(1 - 122)NR (1 - 128)9683
Induction regimen
  Lenalidomide-based53 (1 - 112)0.05*NR (1 - 112)0.02*960.41840.09
  Non-lenalidomide-based39 (1 - 123)78(1 - 123)9483
Maintenance regimen
  Lenalidomide-based53 (1 - 123)0.003*1040.02*98< 0.001*870.16
  Non-lenalidomide-based38 (2 - 91)NR9186
Maintenance regimen
  PI-based54 (11 - 97)0.43NR0.82940.23860.054
  Non-PI-based46 (37 - 55)92 (NR)8976

 

Table 3. Univariate Analysis of Factors Associated With PFS and OS
 
Univariate analysisPFS HR (95% CI)OS HR (95% CI)
ISS: International Staging System; PFS: progression-free survival; OS: overall survival; HCT-CI: hematopoietic cell transplantation specific comorbidity index; HR: hazard ratio; CI: confidence interval.
Cytogenetic risk profile: high-risk2.085 (1.483 - 2.931)1.421 (0.897 - 2.252)
Presence of +1q abnormality0.761 (0.417 - 1.387)1.250 (0.618 - 2.532)
ISS II/III1.183 (0.881 - 1.588)1.197 (0.821 - 1.743)
Lenalidomide-based induction0.740 (0.550 - 0.996)0.628 (0.430 - 0.919)
Melphalan 200 mg/m20.797 (0.566 - 1.123)0.786 (0.512 - 1.207)
Proteasome inhibitor-based maintenance0.852 (0.572 - 1.271)0.942 (0.571 - 1.554)
Lenalidomide-based maintenance0.426 (0.318 - 0.570)0.376 (0.263 - 0.538)
Age > 651.068 (0.801 - 1.423)1.064 (0.738 - 1.535)
Race/ethnicity: White vs. African American0.955 (0.718 - 1.269)1.018 (0.711 - 1.456)
HCT-CI 3+0.823 (0.478 - 1.416)1.053 (0.481 - 2.306)

 

Table 4. Multivariate Analysis of Factors Associated With PFS and OS
 
Multivariate analysisPFS HR (95% CI)OS HR (95% CI)
ISS: International Staging System; PFS: progression-free survival; OS: overall survival; HCT-CI: hematopoietic cell transplantation specific comorbidity index; HR: hazard ratio; CI: confidence interval.
Cytogenetic risk profile: high-risk0.285 (0.142 - 0.572)0.699 (0.218 - 2.236)
Presence of +1q abnormality1.682 (0.922 - 3.068)1.916 (0.752 - 4.881)
ISS II/III1.628 (0.854 - 3.102)1.266 (0.467 - 3.433)
Lenalidomide-based induction1.502 (0.681 - 3.310)1.447 (0.427 - 4.910)
Melphalan 200 mg/m21.110 (0.493 - 2.500)1.727 (0.464 - 6.428)
Proteasome inhibitor-based maintenance0.191 (0.072 - 0.508)0.306 (0.077 - 1.209)
Lenalidomide-based maintenance0.267 (0.118 - 0.606)0.158 (0.054 - 0.458)
Age > 652.280 (1.162 - 4.474)1.848 (0.642 - 5.317)
Race/ethnicity: White vs. African American0.815 (0.434 - 1.531)1.123 (0.424 - 2.973)
HCT-CI 3+0.653 (0.301 - 1.416)1.169 (0.391 - 3.492)