Journal of Hematology, ISSN 1927-1212 print, 1927-1220 online, Open Access
Article copyright, the authors; Journal compilation copyright, J Hematol and Elmer Press Inc
Journal website https://www.thejh.org

Original Article

Volume 10, Number 3, June 2021, pages 114-122


Comparative Effectiveness of a Six-Week Treatment Course of Vitamin D2 and D3 in Children With Sickle Cell Anemia in Steady State With Hypovitaminosis D: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1. Flow chart of recruited subjects.
Figure 2.
Figure 2. Comparison of median rise in serum 25(OH)D between oral vitamin D2 and D3. 25(OH)D: 25-hydroxyvitamin D.

Tables

Table 1. Comparison of the Effects of Oral Vitamin D2 and D3 on Serum 25(OH)D
 
Vitamin D2Vitamin D3U-valueP-value
U-value: Mann-Whitney test was used for comparison as variables were not normally distributed. IQR: interquartile range; 25(OH)D: 25-hydroxyvitamin D.
Baseline
  Median (IQR)38.87 (28.6 - 45.6)38.27 (30.6 - 48.0)-0.0420.966
  Range21.18 - 73.3118.12 - 66.90
Post intervention
  Median (IQR)53.24 (45.3 - 70.0)54.77 (40.4 - 79.7)0.9660.940
  Range26.51 - 189.1024.27 - 146.90

 

Table 2. Association Between Change in Serum 25(OH)D and Sociodemographic Characteristics
 
Change from baseline, median (IQR)U-valueP-value
Kruskal-Wallis analysis was used for age groups and social class, while Mann-Whitney test was used for gender because the variables were not normally distributed. IQR: interquartile range; 25(OH)D: 25-hydroxyvitamin D.
Age group (years)8.0990.017
  1 - 527.37 (9.7 - 79.4)
  6 - 1015.94 (8.7 - 33.1)
  11 - 1816.03 (1.5 - 30.2)
Gender-0.4330.665
  Male16.48 (7.4 - 37.7)
  Female17.05 (5.3 - 33.4)
Social class0.5470.761
  Upper15.63 (9.1 - 37.8)
  Middle17.69 (7.8 - 33.4)
  Lower17.10 (4.9 - 32.6)

 

Table 3. Association Between Change in Serum 25(OH)D and Nutritional Status
 
Change from baseline, median (IQR)U-valueP-value
BMI: body mass index; IQR: interquartile range; 25(OH)D: 25-hydroxyvitamin D.
Weight for length
  Wasting12.8 (10.3)-0.9340.403
  No wasting27.8 (11.5 - 77.2)
Weight for age
  Underweight12.67 (11.3 - 24.2)-0.6330.545
  Normal weight18.81 (8.7 - 41.6)
Length/height for age
  Stunting8.61 (1.6 - 17.7)-1.9060.057
  No stunting17.9 (7.4 - 35.6)
BMI for age
  Thinness16.9 (8.8 - 36.4)0.3260.850
  Normal17.9 (9.05 - 33.5)
  Overweight/obese6.7 (2.07)

 

Table 4. Classification of Subjects Based on Response to Vitamin D Therapy
 
Change in vitamin D statusD2D3Totalχ2P-value
*Fisher exact test was performed because the figures were small.
From deficientn = 56n = 54n = 110
  To sufficient8 (14.2)15 (27.8)23 (20.9)2.560.11
  To insufficient24 (42.9)11 (20.4)35 (31.8)7.170.007
Remained deficient24 (42.9)28 (51.9)52 (47.3)1.430.23
From insufficientn = 9n = 10n = 19
  To sufficient3 (33.3)5 (50.0)8 (42.1)0.65*
  Remained insufficient6 (66.7)5 (50.0)11 (57.9)

 

Table 5. Comparison of Serum Calcium Levels Before and After Intervention Between the Treatment Groups
 
D2D3t-valueP-value
Baseline
  Mean ± SD8.85 ± 1.28.86 ± 1.20.7350.464
  Range6.85 - 11.176.76 - 11.21
Post treatment
  Mean ± SD8.95 ± 0.79.04 ± 0.7-0.7330.465
  Range7.16 - 10.057.19 - 11.23

 

Table 6. Serum Alkaline Phosphatase Levels Before and After Intervention
 
D2D3U-valueP-value
Mann-Whitney U test was used for analysis as variables were not normally distributed. IQR: interquartile range.
Baseline
  Median (IU/L)283.4299.7-0.3160.752
  IQR246.6 - 367.9247.9 - 343.3
Post-treatment
  Median (IU/L)228.9228.9-0.6060.544
  IQR201.6 - 267.1185.3 - 267.1